SF Signal's Three Hoarsemen (I think it might have been Fred) last year, there used to be a time when the annual SF output was much smaller, and it was possible to have seen or read everything (or most of the major works) from a given year, and because of that, the SF community had a common language or set of terms of reference when making Hugo nominations — one could nominate a work of excellence knowing that a lot of others in the community probably felt the same way, or at least had heard of what you were talking about, and thus one's nomination stood a reasonable chance of actually getting support, and maybe landing the award itself. Today, on the other hand, with so much out there, the community is much more fragmented, and it's increasingly the case that one can nominate a work — even a book, story, or movie of tremendous excellence — but because of the huge number of choices, the percentages of fans who are making similar nominations or backing the same nomination are getting much smaller.
Is it fair to make a nomination? Is it worth while?
I used to worry about this sort of thing a lot when it came to making award nominations (whether it was the Hugos, on the rare occasions when I went to Worldcons, or the Auroras). But I've slowly started growing indifferent to that kind of angst. I'm the first to admit that I haven't read or watched everything new in a given year — I can't! I have a life, not to mention one hell of a reading and viewing backlog because of the aforementioned avalanche of interesting stuff. And as far as low likelihoods of stories or novels that I nominate actually making it to the podium? Well, as Han Solo famously said: "Never tell me the odds!" Sometimes it's more important just to make the attempt, to nominate the thing and show fellow fans (and possibly its creators) that it's a thing worth paying attention to, even if only half a dozen other people ever bother paying attention to it.
So, about a week ago, I just got on with it and filed my nominations for the 2015 Hugo Awards.
For what it's worth, here they are:
Echopraxia by Peter Watts
Annihilation by Jeff Vandermeer
Traitor's Blade by Sebastien De Castille
I've reviewed all three of these novels previously on the blog, so I won't bother to summarize, but, of the few new novels of 2014 that I read last year, I'd say these are the worthies. Traitor's Blade, being the fun, fast-reading romp that it is, is very much the dark horse here — I suspect there aren't many other voters out there who've read it, and it certainly isn't as heavy a book in terms of subject matter or meaning. But, seeing as how it was a damn fun read, I think it's worth the nod. The other two books here speak for themselves — if you've read them, how could you not nominate them?
The Slow Regard of Silent Things by Patrick Rothfuss
Another short book that I've already reviewed here, but I'll say again that it was such a finely-crafted and sweet little story that it would be a crime not to include it on the nomination roster. I don't think I read any other novellas in 2014 that were published that year, so I can't make any other nominations.
The Truth is a Cave in the Black Mountains by Neil Gaiman
This one was a little problematic, in that I seem to recall reading that the copyright for this story is actually a couple of years old. And yet, this (the illustrated hardcover chapbook from William Morrow/Harper Collins) is the first time I've encountered it, and it appears to (at least) be the first time it's been published with the accompanying illustrations. So, because it was so damn absorbing for such a little tale (and probably because it was also very much on my mind with my reading of it coinciding very closely with my trip to Scotland in the wake of attending Worldcon in London last year), I figured I'd nominate it in hopes that it's actually eligible and that enough other people had read it and agreed on its worthiness. Again, no other novelettes read last year from last year, or, at least, none that I can recall, so there are no other nominations from me in this category.
Best Short Story:
"The Body Politic" by John Jantunen in Fractured — Tales of the Canadian Post Apocalypse
"Maxim Fujiyama and Other Persons" by Claude Lalumiere in Fractured — Tales of the Canadian Post Apocalypse
"Manitou-Wapow" by GMB Chomichuk in Fractured — Tales of the Canadian Post Apocalypse
"Empty Heat" by Agnes Cadieux in On Spec Magazine (Summer 2014)
"Persistence of Vision" by Orrin Grey in Fractured — Tales of the Canadian Post Apocalypse
Yes, most of these come from the same anthology, but that collection was just so damn good (hands down one of the three best anthologies I've read in the last decade — along with Old Mars and Masked Mosaic: Canadian Super Stories) and these particular stories were so incredible that it would have been inexcusable not to nominate them. Granted, because all of these stories are Canadian, it's highly unlikely many — if any — of them will receive other nominations or make it to the final ballot, but, odds aside (sing it, Han!), they are worthy of nomination none-the-less.
Best Related Work:
Pass. Nothing came to mind.
Best Graphic Story:
Nemo — The Roses of Berlin by Alan Moore and Kevin O'Neill
The Truth is a Cave in the Black Mountains by Neil Gaiman and Eddie Campbell
I've always enjoyed Moore and O'Neill's League of Extraordinary Gentlemen graphic novels, and 'Roses certainly didn't disappoint. As for The Truth, well, given the sheer number of illustrations (and their importance in heightening the mood of the tale) in this book, I think it ought to qualify for this category.
Best Dramatic Presentation (Long Form):
Guardians of the Galaxy
The Lego Movie
Captain America — The Winter Soldier
The Hobbit — The Battle of Five Armies
Without a doubt, 'Guardians was the best SF movie of the year. If it doesn't take the Hugo, I'll... well, actually, I'll just assume that enough other people liked other movies a little more. Anyway. The Lego Movie, aside from being a nakedly crass marketing opportunity, was smart and pretty damn funny (once it got past a little initial slowness), and worth a nod. The Interview? Science fiction? Well, yes. It's either set in the near future or an alternate present (where the enormously unlikely possibility of an idiot talk show host and his more realistic producer getting invited to North Korea, and playing a role in upsetting the Kim regime, actually happens), so that's SF in my books (if barely). Will this movie get the Hugo? Not a chance. But it's worth a nomination. And then 'Cap is back in a generally interesting flick, if one that lost me at the end with the threat of the helicarrier apocalypse that probably could have been put to a swift end by any first world country possessing defence satellites. I'm comfortable nominating it anyway. And lastly, The Hobbit conclusion. A little more problematic with this one because I found the movie too choppy, and there were more scenes that proved that overall, Jackson and company may love Tolkien's works, but they don't really understand them. Still, it was a big effort to conclude a series that's been a big effort, and one that was, overall, entertaining, so I'm giving this flick the nomination nod too.
Best Dramatic Presentation (Short Form):
"Grand Guignol" from Penny Dreadful
"The Watchers on the Wall" from Game of Thrones
"Listen" from Doctor Who
"The Saint of Last Resorts" from Constantine
"The Laws of Gods and Men" from Game of Thrones
If you haven't been watching Penny Dreadful, you should be. Go out and rent it right now. It's smart and dark and viscerally unsettling, and it brings all the classic Victorian monsters together in one setting without being silly. "Grand Guignol" was the perfect season finale, and because it left me in a state of frustration waiting for next season to begin, it's definitely worth a Hugo. Two nominations for Game of Thrones are in order (and, let's face it, the show probably deserves more nods for more of last season's episodes, but we've gotta be fair to the other good programs out there in TVland), those being for "The Watchers on the Wall" — the big payoff battle between the Night's Watch and the Wildlings that we've all been waiting for — and "The Laws of Gods and Men" — focusing on the trial of Tyrion Lannister and some first-class acting by Peter Dinklage. Constantine was a bit of a surprise last fall — I wasn't sure what DC would do with the character for TV, but it quickly proved itself to be a very entertaining show that doesn't pull any punches. "The Saint of Last Resorts" was a brutal half-season break finale that left me wanting more, so, cue-up the nomination. And "Listen" was probably the most frightening Doctor Who episode since "Blink", especially since the attempt to neatly and soothingly tie things up at the end was in no way convincing. I'd be content if this episode lands the award, though, really, I'd like to see Penny Dreadful get it.
Best Professional Editor (Short Form):
Pass. None really stood out last year.
Best Professional Editor (Long Form):
Pass. Same as above.
Best Professional Artist:
Pass. In this case, I thought that not having seen enough art from 2014 was a legitimate reason not to nominate in this category, and I found the nomination criteria to be a little confusing.
On Spec's been my go-to mag for years. Of course I'm going to nominate them! Besides, they need all the love they can get after the damn Canada Council pulled their funding last year.
Pass. SF Signal took itself out of the running to give others a chance (an unquestionably classy act), so I can't vote for them. I do visit other sites/blogs from time to time, but not often enough to warrant a nomination. And I can't nominate my own blog because I would consider that to be bad form. So... pass.
The Three Hoarsemen
The SF Signal Podcast
I think everyone should nominate The Three Hoarsemen for Best Fancast this year. Really. It is probably the best SF-related podcast out there. The hosts are knowledgable, easy conversationalists who air thoughtful discussions on all manner of stories (whether they be in book, comic, TV or movie form) that are guaranteed to draw the listener in. There's no grandstanding or interruption of one-another, and when they pick guests, those participants are chosen for their intelligence and interesting points of view, and they absorb seamlessly into the show, so that it feels like they've always been a part of it. Indeed, the only flaws with the Hoarsemen are that their episodes aren't more frequent (but, hey, I guess they're allowed to have lives), and that nearly every episode will add to your list of books/comics/etc that you previously didn't know that you needed to have, but now have to run out and get as soon as possible. The Three Hoarsemen is the show that deserves to win. That said, if you have to nominate another podcast, the SF Signal Podcast is the one to give the nod to. Generally entertaining and with a lot of names coming in and out to offer varying perspectives, there's a reason why this podcast landed the Hugo last year, and is worthy of consideration again.
Best Fan Writer:
Pass. I've read a lot of articles and whatnot over the past year, some by very talented people, but none of them has really stayed with me, and, if I can't remember a person's articles (or at least one of them), can I really nominate them? And, like with the Best Fanzine category, I can't nominate myself, because then I'd be an ass. Or, at least, more of an ass than I already am, and there are just some lines I'm not willing to cross.
Best Fan Artist:
Pass. Again, as good as some pieces of art that I've seen have been, nothing really stands out in memory.
The John W Campbell Award:
Pass. I don't think I read any new writers in 2014 who fit the criteria (although, it's possible I have, and at the time I just didn't recognize that they were new writers, or I don't have a full grasp of the nomination criteria).
So those are my nominations for the Hugos. If you're still pondering yourself, maybe some of these will give you some suggestions. And, at the very least, if you haven't read/seen/listened-to these works before, maybe reading this will prompt you to give some of them a try (hopefully my ramblings won't drive you away from them!).
Best of luck to everyone nominated for a Hugo or the John W Campbell Award this year!